RTX 2070 vs GTX 1070 [12

您所在的位置:网站首页 蓝天1070 2070 RTX 2070 vs GTX 1070 [12

RTX 2070 vs GTX 1070 [12

2024-07-16 03:55| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GTX 1070 Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce RTX 2070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 107020168 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt 34.99 RTX 207020188 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt 41.85 +19.6% GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 RX 5700 Arc A580 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents Primary details Cost-effectiveness evaluation Detailed specifications Form factor & compatibility VRAM capacity and type Connectivity and outputs Supported technologies API compatibility Performance benchmarks In-game performance breakdown Pros & cons summary Vote for your favorite Comparisons with similar GPUs Community ratings Questions & comments GTX 1070 RTX 2070 Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking13783Place by popularity32not in top-100Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.4331.15ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)GPU code namePascal GP104Turing TU106Market segmentDesktopDesktopRelease date6 May 2016 (8 years ago)27 August 2018 (5 years ago)Launch price (MSRP)$379 $499 Current price$180 (0.5x MSRP)$309 (0.6x MSRP) Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 has 14% better value for money than GTX 1070.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202304CUDA cores1920no dataCore clock speed1506 MHz1410 MHzBoost clock speed1683 MHz1620 MHzNumber of transistors7,200 million10,800 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm12 nmPower consumption (TDP)150 Watt175 WattMaximum GPU temperature94 °Cno dataTexture fill rate202.0233.3Floating-point performance6,463 gflopsno data Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length10.5" (26.7 cm)229 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectors8-pin1x 8-pinSLI options+no data VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GBMemory bus width256 Bit256 BitMemory clock speed8 GB/s14000 MHzMemory bandwidth256 GB/s448.0 GB/sShared memory-- Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CMulti monitor support+no dataHDMI++G-SYNC support++ Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no dataVR Ready++Ansel+no data API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)Shader Model6.46.5OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan+1.2.131CUDA+7.5 Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 34.99 RTX 2070 41.85 +19.6%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 13512 RTX 2070 16161 +19.6%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 20% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 24652 RTX 2070 31260 +26.8%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 27% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 50995 RTX 2070 63155 +23.8%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 24% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 18255 RTX 2070 23186 +27%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 27% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 106934 RTX 2070 127652 +19.4%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 19% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1070 45011 RTX 2070 87366 +94.1%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 94% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1070 463865 +9% RTX 2070 425550

GTX 1070 outperforms RTX 2070 by 9% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 1070 46299 RTX 2070 87125 +88.2%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 88% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1070 45301 RTX 2070 95666 +111%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 111% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 82 RTX 2070 123 +50%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 50% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 132 RTX 2070 149 +13.3%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 13% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

GTX 1070 169 RTX 2070 194 +15%

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1070 by 15% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122 −7.4% 131 +7.4% 1440p67 −26.9% 85 +26.9% 4K50 −22% 61 +22% FPS performance in popular games

Full HDLow Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 −23.3% 70−75 +23.3%

Full HDMedium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89 −13.5% 101 +13.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 −42.6% 87 +42.6% Battlefield 5 164 +0% 164 +0% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91 −27.5% 116 +27.5% Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 −23.3% 70−75 +23.3% Far Cry 5 109 −13.8% 124 +13.8% Far Cry New Dawn 110 −34.5% 148 +34.5% Forza Horizon 4 129 −10.1% 142 +10.1% Hitman 3 70−75 −61.1% 116 +61.1% Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 −63.8% 231 +63.8% Metro Exodus 127 −13.4% 144 +13.4% Red Dead Redemption 2 115 +4.5% 110 −4.5% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 −26.5% 160−170 +26.5% Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 −18.9% 107 +18.9%

Full HDHigh Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76 −13.2% 86 +13.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 −19.7% 73 +19.7% Battlefield 5 152 −2.6% 156 +2.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82 −29.3% 106 +29.3% Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 −23.3% 70−75 +23.3% Far Cry 5 88 −14.8% 101 +14.8% Far Cry New Dawn 86 −25.6% 108 +25.6% Forza Horizon 4 261 +15% 227 −15% Hitman 3 70−75 −29.2% 93 +29.2% Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 −75.9% 248 +75.9% Metro Exodus 106 −15.1% 122 +15.1% Red Dead Redemption 2 103 +0% 103 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 −26.5% 160−170 +26.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120 −31.7% 158 +31.7% Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 −171% 244 +171%

Full HDUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55 −16.4% 64 +16.4% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 −6.6% 65 +6.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61 −27.9% 78 +27.9% Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 −23.3% 70−75 +23.3% Far Cry 5 66 −19.7% 79 +19.7% Forza Horizon 4 94 −17% 110 +17% Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 +1.4% 139 −1.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 −26.5% 160−170 +26.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 −38.1% 87 +38.1% Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 +40.6% 64 −40.6%

Full HDEpic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 93 −6.5% 99 +6.5%

1440pHigh Preset

Battlefield 5 71 −49.3% 106 +49.3% Far Cry New Dawn 73 −78.1% 130 +78.1%

1440pUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45 −15.6% 52 +15.6% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 −31.6% 50 +31.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60 −25% 75 +25% Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 −30.8% 30−35 +30.8% Far Cry 5 68 −29.4% 88 +29.4% Forza Horizon 4 79 −17.7% 93 +17.7% Hitman 3 40−45 −45.5% 64 +45.5% Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 −38.7% 104 +38.7% Metro Exodus 71 −15.5% 82 +15.5% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85 −24.1% 100−110 +24.1% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 −26.5% 60−65 +26.5% Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 −56.7% 47 +56.7%

1440pEpic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69 −21.7% 84 +21.7%

4KHigh Preset

Battlefield 5 50 −6% 53 +6% Far Cry New Dawn 30 −46.7% 44 +46.7% Hitman 3 27−30 −46.4% 41 +46.4% Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 −25.6% 50−55 +25.6% Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26 −53.8% 40 +53.8% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 −46.5% 63 +46.5%

4KUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26 −38.5% 36 +38.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 −47.6% 31 +47.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24 −37.5% 33 +37.5% Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 −36.4% 14−16 +36.4% Far Cry 5 23 −34.8% 31 +34.8% Forza Horizon 4 52 −21.2% 63 +21.2% Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 −41.9% 61 +41.9% Metro Exodus 38 −34.2% 51 +34.2% Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 −58.8% 27 +58.8%

4KEpic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 34 −38.2% 47 +38.2%

This is how GTX 1070 and RTX 2070 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 is 7% faster in 1080pRTX 2070 is 27% faster in 1440pRTX 2070 is 22% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 is 41% faster.in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 is 171% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1070 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)RTX 2070 is ahead in 66 tests (92%)there's a draw in 2 tests (3%) Pros & cons summary Performance score 34.99 41.85 Recency 6 May 2016 27 August 2018 Cost $379 $499 Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 1070 has its recommended price lower by $120, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070, on the other hand, has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 1070 GeForce RTX 2070 Like Like Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT GeForce RTX 2070 vs Arc A580 GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce GTX 1170 GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce RTX 2080 GeForce GTX 1070 vs TITAN RTX GeForce GTX 1070 vs GRID M40 GeForce GTX 1070 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 7689 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4 3264 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS


【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3